Panasonic G10--Excellent Picture Quality and Price Combination
This is based on my experience with the TC-P50G10 which is identical to P46 but with a larger screen. I bought it three weeks ago and am very happy with it. I did a lot of research and tried out a number of TVs before settling down on this one so I thought I would share some of the information and my experience with the TV and hopefully make your decision in choosing the TV a bit easier.
First thing first. According to my research the Panasonic G10 probably has the best picture quality among all TVs in mass production as of the time of this review (May 2009). Most importantly it has pitch dark black level scorching brightness high color accuracy and good motion processing.
I chose the Panasonic plasma over Sony and Samsung LCD for a few reasons. (1) Compared to 120Hz LCDs Panasonic is significantly cheaper than Sony and Samsung. (2) I think the G10 is better in handling motion than the 120HZ LCDs. (3) The colors on the plasma are more appealing to me than those on the LCDs. (4) It has superior viewing angle. It looks perfect from any angle you will actually watch the TV without washing out the color prserving the quality of the color.
The third point on color appeal is subjective and calls for description of subjective experience. There are lots of technical comparison of the colors on different displays on the internet but my perceptual experience is that the colors on the panasonic plasma is very vibrant punchy tantalizing and mesmerizing. The colors look like things in real life but they are more intense than real life. A friend said "it's prettier than real but not distorted. It is just like an enhanced colorful world." If you prefer high fedelity to real life colors you can use the THX mode to tune it down to be very faithful to studio color measures. LCD in comparison is also very vibrant but it doesn't look as realistic. It's more like computer graphics and less like colors of living things. Technically this may have to do with the deeper black level on the plasma than the LCD.
Before the G10 I had the Panasonic Viera TH-46PZ80U 46-Inch 1080p Plasma HDTV. Both TVs have very appealing colors but I returned the PZ80U and got the G10 because the G10 has a number of important improvements over the PZ80U: it has a brighter plasma display has a VGA PC input lower energy consumption and more accurate color. Also its frame is more compact so I can fit a 50" G10 into the space that would only hold a 46" PZ80U. In fact the G10 is brighter and more contrasty than last year's top model Panasonic TH-50PZ850U 50-inch Viera 1080p Plasma HDTV.
What else do I like about the TV? It is very bright for a Plasam TV. According to tech specs and online reviews it is the bightest plasma ever made. In Custom Mode it is more than bright enough to watch in my room with direct sun light (sun light in the room not on the TV). In Vivid Mode "you should prepare to put on your ski googles". In fact it's too bright and overly constrasty and saturated for regular viewing. However it is quite useful in displaying low resolution and low quality online video such as YouTube or Netflix Instant Watch. The extra boost in brightness contrast and saturation make the low quality online video look much more appealing and lively.
VieraCast is kinda cool. Not a deal maker but certainly not a drawback. I used third party firmware DD-WRT to set up a Linksys WRT54G2 Wireless-G Broadband Router as a wireless bridge. So the TV can get online without running a cable to my main router.
I find this TV fits my needs perfectly. But no TV is perfect at least not for the technically savvy.
So here are the cons:
(1) The sound is mediocre. It is fine to watch a TV show but lackluster to watch a good movie or music show.
(1.2) True Cinema 24-frame mode flickering is perceptually disturbing because the refresh rate is set to 48 Hz in the mode. It is a pitty because motion does look much more life like and less video like in True-Cinema mode. Wish the TV could run at 72 Hz.
(2) My PC only has VGA out but no DVI out. (This point does not matter for those with DVI out on their computer. A DVI to VGA cable will work fine) The VGA input on the TV does not support 1080 HD. It only supports up to 1280x768. Panny should not cut corner here. Although this problem doesn't really matter for video contents because most computer video resolution is less than 1280x768. And the pixel interpolation effect on the Plasma is more like a CRT and less like an LCD. So the set is reasonably good at displaying contents with resolution lower than its native res.
(3) VieraCast needs improvement. The content is still limited. The search function of Youtube on VieraCast is not as easy to use as on a computer. The Amazon video on demand price is way too high (but this is not really Panny's problem). I would kill for a firmware upgrade that enables Netflix streaming.
(4) The remote is not as well laid out as the one on PZ80. The 3 big buttons above the directional keys are occupied by the rarely used VieraLink VieraCast and VieraTool. The commonly used Menu key is moved to a small key. Totally wrong choice of ergonomics.
(5) VGA PC input is paired with RCA audio input. I wish it is a 3.5mm (1/8 ") mini jack instead which will allow a single cable cable integrating VGA video and mini jack audio. Now I have to use two cables.
(6) The stand does not swivel.
Regardless of the above drawbacks overall I find this TV to have the best picture quality and price combination. The pros by far outweigh the cons. The picture quality of this TV is truly amazing as such some calls it "The New King of Plasma." Anyone seriously considering an HDTV should take a look at this one now that the Pioneer Kuro exited the market.
I highly recommend it.More detail ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment